The following excerpt is from Singh v. Sessions, 17-844 NAC (2nd Cir. 2018):
We have reviewed the decisions of both the BIA and the IJ "for the sake of completeness." Wangchuck v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 448 F.3d 524, 528 (2d Cir. 2006). The applicable standards of review are well established. See 8 U.S.C. 1252(b)(4)(B); Yanqin Weng v. Holder, 562 F.3d 510, 513 (2d Cir. 2009).
"The testimony of the applicant may be sufficient to sustain the applicant's burden without corroboration, but
Page 3
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.