How have the courts interpreted the evidence in the context of a murder trial?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Banks, 189 Cal.Rptr.3d 208, 351 P.3d 330, 61 Cal.4th 788 (Cal. 2015):
murder and sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. We recite the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury's verdict. ( People v. Jackson (2014) 58 Cal.4th 724, 749, 168 Cal.Rptr.3d 635, 319 P.3d 925.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted evidence in the context of evidence in a murder trial where a detective testified that he did not know the identity of the alleged shooter? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted factor (a) in the context of a murder trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances of the crime scene evidence will be admitted during the penalty phase of a penalty trial, does the trial court error not to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated evidence in the context of evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
