How have the courts interpreted sentencing guidelines in sentencing cases?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Duran, 37 F.3d 557 (9th Cir. 1994):
Duran argues that the district court stated insufficient and improper reasons for sentencing him to a particular point within a guideline range of more than 24 months. We treat these issues as questions of law and review them de novo. United States v. Upshaw, 918 F.2d 789 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 930, 111 S.Ct. 1335, 113 L.Ed.2d 266 (1991).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When we review a federal court's interpretation of the sentencing guidelines, what is the effect of the federal sentencing guidelines? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the federal sentencing guidelines in sentencing enhancement cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the burden of appealing against a sentencing judge's sentencing in a case where the sentencing judge referred to a prior error in sentencing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a court of appeals remand to a federal district court for resentencing where the sentence was imposed as a possible result of an incorrect application of the sentencing guidelines? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal district court exercise its discretionary sentencing authority by sentencing a defendant to a minimum sentence based on the Guidelines? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a sentencing judge impose a non-Guidelines sentence or Guidelines sentence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted sentencing guidelines in sentencing decisions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the sentencing packaging doctrine apply to a case where both a new sentence and a revocation sentence were imposed at the conclusion of a single sentencing proceeding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a court departs from the sentencing guidelines, does the court have to indicate a specific reason for the imposition of a sentence different than that described? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court in a case brought by a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
