How have the courts interpreted search and seizure principles in this case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Jackson, 14 Cal.App.3d 57, 92 Cal.Rptr. 91 (Cal. App. 1970):
1 Each of these searches and seizures was prior to the effective date of Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 89 S.Ct. 2034, 23 L.Ed.2d 685. Hence the principles enunciated in that case are not applicable here.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In reviewing a suppression ruling in a search and seizure case, what is the test for determining whether a search or seizure under the Fourth Amendment satisfied? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the appellant's right to counsel in his search and seizure case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the "plain view" doctrine in the context of search and seizure cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a search warrant issued by the California Superior Court of Justice for a stop and seizure of a car in the middle of the night, and what is the effect of this search and seizure? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the exclusionary rule in the context of search and seizure cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted consent to give in a search warrant case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the principles of the Virginia Pharmacy case in the context of a disciplinary rule forbidding attorney advertising? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated a motion to suppress evidence used in a search and seizure case? (California, United States of America)
