How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault cases?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Shehee, B248097 (Cal. App. 2015):
information relied upon was true. (CALCRIM No. 360.) We presume that the jury followed these instructions. (People v. Harris (1994) 9 Cal.4th 407, 431.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted evidence in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the standard of proof in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Penal Code in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the felony-murder instruction in cases involving assault with a deadly weapon? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
