How have the courts interpreted innuendo in a libel case?

"New York", United States of America

The following excerpt is from Demos v. New York Evening Journal Pub. Co., 103 N.E. 771, 210 N.Y. 13 (N.Y. 1913):

how the publication complained of could have had the defamatory effect upon the plaintiff's character and standing complained of, nevertheless, as it cannot be said, as matter of law, that it was incapable of a defamatory meaning, the trial judge should have allowed the jurors to decide whether it could be understood according to the meaning put by the plaintiff upon it by innuendo. Under the settled rule of law, if the language of the alleged libel is ambiguous and capable of an innocent, as well as of a [210 N.Y. 19]disgraceful, meaning, the question becomes one for the jury to settle. Morrison v. Smith, 177 N. Y. 366, 69 N. E. 725. If the words used are capable, by construction, or in their connection and application, of the interpretation given by the innuendo, then a question of fact is raised for the jurors to consider. They should determine, in a case of doubtful meaning, whether the tenor and import of the publication are offensive and defamatory, and whether it could be so understood by the general public, or in the plaintiff's neighborhood. The mere improbability of the meaning claimed for it would not control the question of the right of the jury to pass upon it; the question would be, May the alleged libel be understood as the plaintiff claims?

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted the rule of privilege in the context of a libel action brought by a party who has been scandalized in a libel case? ("New York", United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court in a case brought by a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law supporting a claim that the District Court erred by not remanding an action to state court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the interpretation of reasons in cases involving judicial review in the immigration context? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal district court in the case of Carter v McCarthy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the case law in the context of abortion cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law requiring the trial court to refrain from hearing cases before the appeals court? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.