How have the courts interpreted a prosecutor's closing argument in closing argument?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Foster, 711 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1983):
The prosecutor may well have exceeded the wide latitude permitted counsel in closing argument. See United States v. Parker, 549 F.2d 1217, 1222 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 971, 97 S.Ct. 1659, 52 L.Ed.2d 365 (1977). The next morning, however, defense counsel agreed to the prosecutor's offer to correct any misconception. The prosecutor then told the jury that he was referring to the defendants only and did not mean to imply that defense counsel were part of a conspiracy.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the prosecutor's closing argument in closing argument constitute a comment upon Sanders' failure to take the stand? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts treated counsel's closing argument in closing arguments? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted comments made by a prosecutor in her closing argument? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to compel the Court to dismiss a motion alleging that a judge has improperly interpreted the interpretation of a statutory interpretation of an administrative determination? ("New York", United States of America)
How have courts interpreted closing statements by the prosecution in their rebuttal closing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a claim that the prosecutor's closing argument violated the appellant's fifth amendment rights de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of a prosecutor's closing argument suggesting that "Cubans have a tendency to violence and retribution"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
