How have the courts dealt with the issue of improper use of public funds?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Selivanov, B252894, c/w B255166 (Cal. App. 2016):
13. Defendants do not argue in their opening brief and only make a cursory suggestion in reply that the court's finding increased their penalties by making them ineligible to hold public office. They accordingly have forfeited this contention, and we do not consider it here. (People v. Bryant (2014) 60 Cal.4th 335, 408.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts dealt with the issue of improper use of public funds? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of improper use of funds from a family trust? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of a ballot measure that was challenged in a referendum on the same issue? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of improper counsel at a restitution hearing? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of improper exclusion of evidence in an evidentiary review? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of conspiracy to fabricate false evidence against a public official? (California, United States of America)
Is a plaintiff's claim for damages arising from defendants' conduct "in connection with a public issue or issue of public interest"? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of good faith showing in a motion where a witness has absconded from court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of improper comments by a prosecutor in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have the power to overturn a conviction for sexual assault on the grounds that the trial court improperly instructed the jury to consider the issue of venue? (California, United States of America)
