How have the courts dealt with the issue of an easement that was signed and recorded at Boehringer's request?

The Jarvises contend that Boehringer had "the right and power" to grant an easement over the North Kings property until title transferred to Hilton. They further allege that title to the property did not pass to Hilton until "all the conditions of escrow [were] satisfied," which they assert occurred after the sewer easement was signed and recorded. (See generally Greco v. Oregon Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (1961) 191 Cal.App.2d 674, 680 ["'It is the general rule that where conditions fixed for delivery of a deed are not such as are certain to happen, merely depositing the deed with an escrow holder does not pass title to the grantee'"].) For the purposes of our analysis, we will accept the Jarvises'

Page 24