California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Lasalvia v. Lasalvia (In re Lasalvia), F074023 (Cal. App. 2018):
Husband presented 35 specific objections regarding issues that the court did not explain or failed to consider in its decision. The court was not required to provide specific answers to those questions so long as the statement of decision fairly disclosed its determination of the ultimate issues. (See People v. Casa Blanca Convalescent Homes, Inc., supra, 159 Cal.App.3d at p. 525.) The court issued a 28-page ruling addressing the main contentions of the parties, including the court's determination on each issue. This was a complex case. Each party presented experts and records detailing the significant and varied marital and community property interests of the parties. The court held a 15-day trial with extensive testimony from the parties and their respective experts.
Page 20
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.