How have the courts dealt with a defendant's claim that cumulative errors at trial deprived him of due process?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Williams, B252407 (Cal. App. 2014):
Finally, defendant contends that cumulative errors at trial deprived him of due process. As we have concluded that the trial court did not err, the contention necessarily fails. (See People v. Hines (1997) 15 Cal.4th 997, 1062.)
The judgment is affirmed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a defendant's claim that the cumulative effect of evidentiary errors denied him due process? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a claim that cumulative errors at trial deprived them of due process? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that cumulative errors at trial deprived him of due process? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court dealt with appellant's claim that multiple trial errors during his trial violated his due process rights? (California, United States of America)
How have we dealt with the Attorney General's contention that a defendant forfeited any claim of error by failing to object or request modification to an instruction in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court of Appeal in Ontario dealt with appellant's claim that he was prejudiced by the error-strewn trial court? (California, United States of America)
