How has the Court dealt with appellant's claim that multiple trial errors during his trial violated his due process rights?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Coronado, B255295 (Cal. App. 2015):
Finally, appellant argues that "multiple trial errors" during his trial had a cumulative prejudicial effect that violated his due process rights. ~(AOB 22)~ Since we have found no errors, we disagree with appellant's claim that he was prejudiced by their cumulative impact. (People v. Cook (2006) 39 Cal.4th 566, 608.)
The judgment is affirmed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court of Appeal in Ontario dealt with appellant's claim that he was prejudiced by the error-strewn trial court? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court reject appellant's assertion that expert testimony at trial violated his due process rights and rendered his trial fundamentally unfair? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a defendant's claim that cumulative errors at trial deprived him of due process? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with a claim on appeal that the trial court abused its sentencing process? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated appellant's claim that the court deprived him of his constitutional right to due process by ordering him into placement without an adequate case plan? (California, United States of America)
Is appellant's claim that he was denied a right to exercise his right to a fair trial by a judge in the Superior Court of Appeal that he had been denied a fair hearing? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a claim that the Miranda rights were violated, how have courts reviewed the evidence in the context of Miranda rights claims? (California, United States of America)
