How have rules regulating the admission of evidence proffered by criminal defendants to show that someone else committed the crime with which they are charged been widely accepted?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Glaude, F076021 (Cal. App. 2019):

And "rules regulating the admission of evidence proffered by criminal defendants to show that someone else committed the crime with which they are charged," "are widely accepted" as not violating a defendant's constitutional right to present a defense. (Holmes v. South Carolina (2006) 547 U.S. 319, 327.)

Other Questions


Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime, does other-crimes evidence admissible? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of a criminal defendant's disposition or propensity to commit the charged offense in a criminal case admissible? (California, United States of America)
If a criminal commits a crime in a different county than the one where the crime was committed, would that change the outcome of the criminal trial if the crime occurred in the other county? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence that a defendant committed a crime other than the charged crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of crimes committed by a defendant other than those charged admissible to prove criminal disposition or poor character? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of other crimes or bad acts generally inadmissible when offered to show a defendant had a criminal disposition or propensity to commit the crime charged? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence that a defendant has committed crimes other than those charged admissible to show bad character or predisposition to criminality? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.