The following excerpt is from U.S.A v. Sabhnani, 599 F.3d 215 (2nd Cir. 2010):
fied what was required to convict, and the judge's three-question summary of the charge was perfectly clear, removing the possibility of any confusion on the jury's part. Cf. United States v. Moran, 493 F.3d 1002, 1009-10 (9th Cir.2007) (while instructions might have had "minor ambiguity" after a "careful picking apart" of their wording, clear summarizing or overview paragraph that conveys basic point to jury can cure potential error).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.