How have instructions been interpreted in the context of firearms assault cases?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Stroud, 45 F.3d 438 (9th Cir. 1994):

This issue is directly controlled by United States v. Mendoza, 11 F.3d 126 (9th Cir.1993). The Mendoza court found that the instructions were constitutionally defective because the jury could have found the defendant guilty for merely "carrying" a firearm and that "using" the firearm "to facilitate" the crime was not the equivalent of "in relation to" the crime. Id. at 129.

Other Questions


In a sexual assault case, how have the jury instructions been interpreted in the context of sexual assault cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have instructions been interpreted in the context of sexual assault cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the language of Instruction 18 of the intoxication instruction in a criminal case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the "Blockburger test" in the context of sexual assault cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the interpretation of reasons in cases involving judicial review in the immigration context? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How have courts interpreted section 164.395 of the Criminal Code in the context of sexual assault cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the case law in the context of abortion cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the federal district court applied the guidelines on sexual assault in the context of the sexual assault case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the relevant case law in the context of the substantive elements of a sexual assault case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated sexual assault allegations against state officials in the context of sexual assault cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.