How have courts treated eyewitness testimony in the context of an assault case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Calderon v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty., C088483 (Cal. App. 2020):
1. In our appeal affirming petitioner's conviction, we described the eyewitness testimony as strong and unequivocal, and amply corroborated with circumstantial evidence. (People v. Calderon (Oct. 27, 2005, C045938) [nonpub. opn.].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the Court treated prior sexual assault cases in the context of domestic violence cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the testimony of a defendant's daughter in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated sex offenders in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a suppression motion in the context of an assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated assault and aggravated assault instructions in the context of torture? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the victim in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated expert testimony in the context of police investigations and subsequent court proceedings? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the testimony of a witness in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated gang evidence in the context of an assault and attempted murder case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated duress and psychological coercion in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
