How have courts treated expert testimony in criminal cases?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Campos, H0035756 (Cal. App. 2012):
People v. Prince (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1179, 1223-1224, explained: "[C]ourts have held an expert may testify concerning criminal modus operandi and may offer the opinion
Page 82
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a civil case, how has the court treated the use of DNA evidence in criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated expert testimony in the context of police investigations and subsequent court proceedings? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court admit or deny testimony from an expert psychologist in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated expert testimony in a mental health case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated questions about the depth or scope of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the opinion of an expert on provocation in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
