How have courts interpreted the words "child" and "children" in a property settlement agreement?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food Mach. & Chem. Corp., 178 F.2d 541 (9th Cir. 1950):

Some illustrations taken from California cases may serve to indicate how these principles are applied to particular situations. The word "children" as used in the beneficiary clause of an insurance policy may be interpreted to include illegitimate children, although the technical, common law meaning of the word excludes illegitimate children. Turner v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., supra.

The use of the words "child" and "children" in a property settlement agreement presents a question of fact whether they are used for descriptive purposes only or imply an undertaking to support them during the entire period of minority. The issue thus presented is whether the words were "intended as terms of description or of limitation." Walsh v. Walsh, 1941, 18 Cal.2d 439, 116 P.2d 62, 65.

The word "transaction" used in a contract for the dissolution of a real estate partnership, which called for a commission to be paid when any transaction leading to a commission was closed, may be interpreted to imply something more than a particular sale, lease or contract. And, because of the broad meaning of the word "transaction," evidence may be resorted to to show the dealings to which the partners had reference. Wachs v. Wachs, 1938, 11 Cal.2d 322, 79 P.2d 1085.

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted the word "children" in the context of the definition of a biological child? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted a property settlement agreement in relation to alimony? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a settlement agreement disposes of a federal Title VII claim, can a breach of the settlement agreement revive the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the Court interpreted the Agreement of Purchase and Use of the Purchase and Sale Agreement? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the terms of an agreement or written agreement regarding alimony under the Income Tax Act? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of an injunction in a settlement where the parties entered into a settlement to resolve a civil action? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When faced with a settlement agreement, when will the courts depart from the terms of that agreement? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
When a federal court dismisses an action with prejudice, does the dismissal of the action by the federal district court result in a separate contract dispute arising from the settlement agreement? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.