The agent for the respondent referred to the decisions in Canada v. Sills [1985] 2 F.C. 200; Canada v. Sigglekow [1985] F.C.J. No. 902. Those decisions hold that the payments, although made later than the time limits provided for in an agreement or judgment, retain their nature as alimony. The judgments also hold that, although a judgment or a written agreement concerning alimony or other allowance may have indicated that such payment is not taxable, this does not prevent the amount from being taxable under the Act. Finding
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.