How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word "negligent or wrongful act or omission" in the context of intentional torts?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Anonymous v. United States, Case No.: 16-cv-0725 W (BLM) (S.D. Cal. 2017):
Id. (citing 28 U.S.C. 1346(b)) (brackets in original). Courts have interpreted the "negligent or wrongful act or omission" language to "encompass both negligent and intentional torts." Waters v. United States, 812 F.Supp. 166, 169 (N.D. Cal. 1993) (citing
Page 9
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the words "meaning and effect" and "substance" in the interpretation of a statute? ("New York", United States of America)
Does the meaning of the word "omission" need to be interpreted in the context of "speciality meaning" in legislation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of a statute in the context of the history of the statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of injunctions in the context of Section 10(l)? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted federal legislation in the context of constitutional interpretation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word "stamp" in the context of a criminal offence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the word "intentionally" in the context of a criminal charge? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted agency interpretation in the context of national security legislation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether an individual has committed an act of gross negligence in the context of an allegation of intentional negligence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the impact rule in the context of intentional infliction of emotional distress? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
