How have courts interpreted the doctrine of avoidable consequences and the duty of mitigation damages?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Galardi Grp. Franchise & Leasing, LLC v. Barstow Town Square, LLC, E064289 (Cal. App. 2016):
Separately and alternatively, this argument lacks merit. Assuming we understand it at all, it invokes the doctrine of avoidable consequences and the duty to mitigate damages. (See generally Mize-Kurzman v. Marin Community College Dist. (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 832, 870-871.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted "prejudicial" or "damaging" statements in the context of damages claims? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of imminent peril in a collision where an intoxicated driver swerved to avoid a collision? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of natural and probable consequences in a murder case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of self-defense in cases that address other legal doctrines? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the natural and probable consequences doctrine in cases involving assault and disturbing the peace? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the natural and probable consequences doctrine in the context of an attempted murder case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a federal agency's interpretation of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
