How have courts interpreted "prejudicial" or "damaging" statements in the context of damages claims?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. Charlton, A122842, San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. 204399 (Cal. App. 2011):
(People v. Ewoldt (1994) 7 Cal.4th 380, 404.) "'Prejudicial'" is not, of course, the same as "'damaging.'" (People v. Karis (1988) 46 Cal.3d 612, 638.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted the Miranda safeguards in the context of a claim that a police officer improperly obtained a witness statement? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of defamatory statements in the context of defamation claims? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the definition of a "mining claim" in the context of a claim for unpaid wages? (California, United States of America)
How has analysis been interpreted in the context of a claim that a plaintiff has been denied a right to sue for damages by the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have a duty to appoint a court-appointed interpreter for an indigent, non-English speaking litigant in a civil small claims proceeding? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does a court-appointed interpreter have to be an interpreter for an indigent plaintiff in a small claims action? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statements by a defendant to a victim that he "knew what he was doing" in the context of the shooting? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda claim in the context of "custodial interrogation"? (California, United States of America)
