The following excerpt is from Evergreen Ass'n, Inc. v. City of N.Y., Docket No. 11-2735-cv, Docket No. 11-2929-cv (2nd Cir. 2014):
The use of nonexclusive factors is admittedly imprecise, but the "prohibition against excessive vagueness does not invalidate every statute which a reviewing court believes could have been drafted with greater precision." Rose v. Locke, 423 U.S. 48, 49 (1975). "Many statutes will have some inherent vagueness, for in most English words and phrases there lurk uncertainties." Id. at 49-50 (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.