California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Everett v. Everett, 150 Cal.App.3d 1053, 201 Cal.Rptr. 351 (Cal. App. 1984):
11 While we are only taking the next logical step after County of Fresno v. Superior Court (1979) 92 Cal.App.3d 133, 154 Cal.Rptr. 660, in requiring trial courts to order additional blood tests requested by a party, we do not base that requirement on section 893 as the appellate court did in County of Fresno. Rather, we rely on the provisions of section 892. Although we agree with the result reached in County of Fresno, we question that court's reliance on section 893 in making the order of HLA test mandatory by the trial court upon request of a party.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.