How have courts interpreted section 893 of the California Code of Civil Procedure when requiring additional blood tests?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Everett v. Everett, 150 Cal.App.3d 1053, 201 Cal.Rptr. 351 (Cal. App. 1984):

11 While we are only taking the next logical step after County of Fresno v. Superior Court (1979) 92 Cal.App.3d 133, 154 Cal.Rptr. 660, in requiring trial courts to order additional blood tests requested by a party, we do not base that requirement on section 893 as the appellate court did in County of Fresno. Rather, we rely on the provisions of section 892. Although we agree with the result reached in County of Fresno, we question that court's reliance on section 893 in making the order of HLA test mandatory by the trial court upon request of a party.

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 17,000 of the California Code of Civil Procedure and how have they interpreted the law? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant to appeal against the California Supreme Court's finding that the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure is unconstitutional? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 830.6(1) of the California Highway Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether a defendant is immune from liability under the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpreting the meaning of the word "reasonable and common sense interpretation" in the context of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of a section of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure requiring a cap on the amount of cannabis that can be confiscated? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 19996.2(a) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether an employee has been on an unauthorized leave for a period of time? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for Section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a breach of section 654 or section 744 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.