How have courts interpreted section 3333.2 and section 1431.2 of the California Health Care Act?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Hughes v. Pham, E052469 (Cal. App. 2014):
"To the extent a specific statute is inconsistent with a general statute potentially covering the same subject matter, the specific statute must be read as an exception to the more general statute." (Salazar v. Eastin (1995) 9 Cal.4th 836, 857.) Because section 3333.2 places a cap on the total recovery of noneconomic damages from health care providers, it is the more specific statute, and we read it as an exception to section 1431.2.9
Page 24
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 3333.2 and section 1431.2 of the California Health Care Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054.3(b) of the Mental Health Act restrict the prosecution's access to materials derived from mental health examinations conducted under section 1054 of the Act, which were obtained from a mental health clinic? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1018 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant makes a statement in open court that authorizes or adopts a motion to withdraw his plea? (California, United States of America)
How has section 654 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted and interpreted by courts? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any power or authority to interpret a section of the California Penal Code that is ambiguous and ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
How has section 69894.1 of the California Constitution been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
How has section 667.5(b) of the California Criminal Code been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
