How have courts found an error of error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Lozano, 192 Cal.App.3d 618, 237 Cal.Rptr. 612 (Cal. App. 1987):
5 Although in People v. Brew (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 1102 and People v. Stewart, supra, 145 Cal.App.3d 967, 193 Cal.Rptr. 799, the courts found similar error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, those cases are factually distinguishable from this one.
6 We do not, however, address defendant's contention concerning the court's instructions on intent.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
What is the federal harmless error standard for determining that an error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
How has the prosecution and defense argued that the error in Beeman error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for prejudice in a motion where the error was found to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a federal error was found to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is a legal error by the California Superior Court harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the requirement in criminal cases that constitutional error be found harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court error of inadequately warning a defendant of the pitfalls and hazards involved in self-representation constitute harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a court error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the requirement in criminal cases that constitutional error be found harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
