California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Davies v. Superior Court, 204 Cal.Rptr. 154, 36 Cal.3d 291, 682 P.2d 349 (Cal. 1984):
[36 Cal.3d 304] Where it is not possible to accommodate both interests, courts have carried out their "careful balancing" by requiring a litigant to show a particular need for the information. The showing which a litigant must make varies, depending on the weight accorded the privacy interest. For example, in Britt v. Superior Court (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 143 Cal.Rptr. 695, 574 P.2d 766, this court held that where a defendant sought discovery which implicated the First Amendment associational rights of a large class of plaintiffs, it was entitled only to
Page 163
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.