How has the jury been instructed on the reasonable doubt standard of proof in a sexual assault case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Fleming, F064115 (Cal. App. 2014):
remark. In addition, the trial court instructed the jury on the reasonable doubt standard of proof. (CALCRIM No. 220.) It also instructed the jury with CALCRIM No. 200, which provides, in part, "If you believe that the attorneys' comments on the law conflict with my instructions, you must follow my instructions." We presume the jury obeyed the admonition and the instructions. (People v. Stanley (1995) 10 Cal.4th 764, 837.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there a reasonable likelihood that the jury understood the instruction that a jury would not convict appellant of a charge of sexual assault simply because they concluded beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury case, how have formal instructions been used to instruct the jury on the presumption of innocence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of proof for a prosecutor to argue that a reasonable doubt standard is reasonable? (California, United States of America)
How is the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard applied in sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a district attorney's instruction to a jury in a sexual assault case and the general burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proof in a case where the jury was instructed to find a plaintiff guilty of sexual assault by reason of gross negligence? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reason to exclude evidence of sexual assault prior to the trial of defendant in his sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a jury to overturn a finding of reasonable doubt in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts instructed the jury on the standard of proof in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
