California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Troester v. Starbucks Corp., 235 Cal.Rptr.3d 820, 421 P.3d 1114, 5 Cal.5th 829 (Cal. 2018):
The de minimis rule, as a background principle, has been invoked in a variety of statutory contexts, and courts have decided such cases by examining whether application of the rule would be consistent with the statutory purpose. (See Goehring v. Chapman University (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 353, 384, 17 Cal.Rptr.3d 39 ["Substantial compliance with a statute 'will suffice if the purpose of the statute is satisfied ... but substantial
[5 Cal.5th 844]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.