How has the court interpreted the meaning of a jury instruction in a criminal case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Friend, No. G039675 (Cal. App. 3/11/2010), No. G039675. (Cal. App. 2010):

We fail to see how this argument relates to CALCRIM No. 440. Its purpose was to instruct the jury as to the law. (People v. Saldana (1984) 157 Cal.App.3d 443, 453.) A jury instruction is not designed to give a defendant "adequate notice of what constitutes a felony" vis--vis the prosecutor's charges.

Other Questions


For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the instructions in the context of manslaughter instructions in cases where the instruction was limited or limited? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the instruction in the context of a jury instruction in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have the voir dire questions in a criminal case been interpreted by the trial court and the prosecutor in this case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Does a party have to complain to the Court on appeal that an instruction in a criminal case instructing a jury to convict a defendant of possessing all six firearms was "too general or incomplete"? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.