How has the court dealt with the issue of "coercion" in the context of a claim against Union Oil Company?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Simpson v. Union Oil Company of California, 411 F.2d 897 (9th Cir. 1969):
The court made a finding that this was the only "coercion"9 used against appellant. It was supported by the evidence and by a stipulation entered between counsel at the trial. No agreement provided appellant must take any or all of his gasoline needs from Union. See Simpson v. Union Oil Co., 311 F.2d 764, 766.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts dealt with the issue of conscientious objector claims in the context of local authority issues? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of whether a defendant has been successful in his claim that he has been denied justice by the Court of Appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of legal costs arising from a unionized union action under Section 501 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the union in the context of a claim that the union did not act in bad faith? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the US Supreme Court dealt with the issue of race discrimination in the context of civil rights issues? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a litigant claims that a lower court has taken action beyond its jurisdiction, does the court have power to require the lower court to set matters right? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the preemption doctrine in the context of unionization issues? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
