How has the Court dealt with a claim of prejudicial cumulative effect?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Anderson, B251527 (Cal. App. 2015):
error or have found any assumed errors to be nonprejudicial," we must also reject any claim of prejudicial cumulative effect. (People v. Sapp (2003) 31 Cal.4th 240, 316.)
The judgments are affirmed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts dealt with claims of prejudicial cumulative effect? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the cumulative effect of the trial court's errors? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a defendant's claim that the cumulative effect of evidentiary errors denied him due process? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the cumulative effect of a cumulative set of evidentiary rulings? (California, United States of America)
What is the cumulative effect of errors found by the Court of Appeal when considering cumulative effect? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with a defendant's claim of cumulative effect on a motion to appoint a substitute counsel? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts and prosecutors dealt with the cumulative effect of errors and the prosecutor's misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant bring a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeal claiming that he failed to raise his constitutional claims in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, how have the courts dealt with claims that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence of the victim's other sexual conduct? (California, United States of America)
