How have courts dealt with the cumulative effect of the trial court's errors?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Navarro, E055421 (Cal. App. 2013):
Defendant asserts that the cumulative effect of the trial court's errors resulted in a denial of due process. Having found no error other than the court's computation of conduct credits, we do not address defendant's contention there was prejudicial cumulative error. (People v. Williams (2013) 56 Cal.4th 165, 201.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
What is the cumulative effect of errors found by the Court of Appeal when considering cumulative effect? (California, United States of America)
Does the cumulative effect of a trial court's errors deprive plaintiff of a fair trial? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with errors and misconduct committed by the trial court and the prosecutor? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts and prosecutors dealt with the cumulative effect of errors and the prosecutor's misconduct? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with error at trial where a prosecutor made an error in making an improper remark to a defendant? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a defendant's claim that the cumulative effect of evidentiary errors denied him due process? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court of Appeal in Ontario dealt with appellant's claim that he was prejudiced by the error-strewn trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the cumulative effect of errors at trial affect the fairness of the trial? (California, United States of America)
