How has Section 3568 of the Criminal Code been interpreted by the Court?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Garmon, In re, 572 F.2d 1373 (9th Cir. 1978):

The District of Columbia Circuit in United States v. Liddy, supra, arrived at the same result in a different fashion. It noted that there were many situations in which the running of a prison term is interrupted, postponing the date of the termination of the sentence. Two examples are a prisoner who escapes from prison and a parolee who commits offenses which lead to the revocation of his parole, requiring him to serve the portion of his sentence that remained when he was paroled. Thus 3568 was never intended to reach cases in which a sentence would be interrupted owing to some "fault of the prisoner." A recalcitrant prison witness similarly interrupts his sentence because of his intentional refusal to testify before the grand jury.

Other Questions


When counting criminal convictions for career offender purposes under section 4A1.2 of the Criminal Code, is the criminal conviction of a career offender included in the criminal record calculation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 56(2) of the Income Tax Code in the context of Section 56(1) and Section 5(2)? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How have courts interpreted Section 605.05.6(1) of the Criminal Code and what are the exceptions to the section? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 191 of the Code of Civil Procedure and section 529 of the Criminal Procedure? ("New York", United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted Section 894 of the Criminal Code in the context of an allegation that a defendant committed a criminal offence by sealing currency and receiving stolen currency? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted Section 924(c)(1)(A)(A) of the Criminal Code? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Are there any cases where the Supreme Court has found that criminal convictions for common law crimes against individuals who have not been convicted of criminal convictions are sufficient grounds for criminal convictions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the rule that a plaintiff may not use Section 1983 to call into question an outstanding criminal conviction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the plain language of Section 851(a)(2) of the California Criminal Code and what are the implications? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.