How have courts interpreted the rule that a plaintiff may not use Section 1983 to call into question an outstanding criminal conviction?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Poventud v. City of N.Y., Docket No. 12-1011-cv (2nd Cir. 2013):
These decisions consistently and methodically applied the rule that plaintiffs may not use 1983 to call into question an outstanding criminal conviction, a rule that avoided "the prospect of harassment, waste and endless litigation, contrary to principles of federalism." Singleton v. City of N.Y., 632 F.2d 185, 195 (2d Cir. 1980).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Are there any cases where the Supreme Court has found that criminal convictions for common law crimes against individuals who have not been convicted of criminal convictions are sufficient grounds for criminal convictions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When counting criminal convictions for career offender purposes under section 4A1.2 of the Criminal Code, is the criminal conviction of a career offender included in the criminal record calculation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a habeas petitioner who has been convicted of a criminal charge in a federal criminal court have to apply to have his conviction reduced to a state conviction or the length of his confinement in a state prison? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a criminal conviction under section 2113(a) of the Civil Code of Civil Procedure be brought under Section 2113 of the Criminal Code when a plaintiff is injured in an accident? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a habeas petitioner who has been convicted of a criminal charge in a federal criminal court have to apply to have his conviction reduced to a state conviction or the length of his sentence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a revocation of probation imposed on a previous criminal conviction as a result of a new criminal conviction treated as one sentence for purposes of calculating a defendant's criminal history? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 56(2) of the Income Tax Code in the context of Section 56(1) and Section 5(2)? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How have courts interpreted Section 605.05.6(1) of the Criminal Code and what are the exceptions to the section? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which a court has found that combining two criminal convictions for fraud with one criminal conviction for fraud was a reasonable chance of success? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted Section 894 of the Criminal Code in the context of an allegation that a defendant committed a criminal offence by sealing currency and receiving stolen currency? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
