The following excerpt is from United States v. State Water Res. Control Bd., 418 F.Supp.3d 496 (E.D. Cal. 2019):
Defendants first argue that the abstention doctrine set forth in Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of America , 316 U.S. 491, 62 S.Ct. 1173, 86 L.Ed. 1620 (1942), and its progeny, including Wilton v. Seven Falls Co. , 515 U.S. 277, 115 S.Ct. 2137, 132 L.Ed.2d 214 (1995), compels dismissal of the United States' complaint.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.