The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Figueroa, 943 F.2d 55 (9th Cir. 1991):
1 Figueroa seeks to bolster his claim by arguing that the prosecution acted improperly by offering him a less favorable plea bargain than that offered his co-defendant. Nevertheless, he does not argue, nor could he, that the disparity between plea bargains violated his rights. A defendant has no right to a plea bargain. See United States v. Wheat, 813 F.2d 1399, 1405 (9th Cir.1987), aff'd on other grounds, 486 U.S. 153 (1988).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.