Is there a duty on counsel to counsel in high conflict cases?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Ukiri v. Erskine, 2020 ONSC 4294 (CanLII):

In Vasilodimitrakis v. Homme, 2020 ONSC 2084, Bondy J., said that “…high conflict cases must always be approached with a great deal of caution. … It follows that there is an overarching duty on the part of counsel and the court to ensure that the level of conflict is minimized to the greatest extent possible in order to best serve the best interests of the child. I reminded counsel of the importance of explaining that to their clients.” (para. 21)

Other Questions


Is there any case law or case law that states that parties are not aware of the effect of the case on the other side? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that supports a client's decision to continue to have counsel? (Ontario, Canada)
Is supervised access appropriate in high conflict custody and access cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of a medical malpractice case on the economic impact of the case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the relevant case law for giving evidence from a third party witness in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that supports the argument that a judge should consider some of the issues before the trial of the others? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law on expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that supports the argument that a breach of the law by an individual who has committed acts of contempt of court? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law relating to scheduling of winter road patrols after March 31? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law on the admissibility of expert evidence in medical malpractice cases? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.