The applicant is under a duty to mitigate her losses by making reasonable efforts to obtain suitable employment after she resigned. The applicant is entitled to be compensated only for those losses that could not have been avoided and the respondent has the onus of proving the applicant’s failure to mitigate. See Heintz v. Christian Horizons, 2008 HRTO 22 (CanLII) at paragraph 265.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.