In my view, while the discretion is very broad, it is not unfettered. It must be exercised in accordance with principle: Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 2011 BCCA 29 at paras. 22-23. I do not consider that the phrase in Hartshorne – “whether some rationale for the offer was provided” – leads to a requirement that a party must “provide the plaintiff with evidence on which she could judge the reasonableness of the offers to settle”, as the judge suggested at para. 35.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.