The law in relation to mobility summarized in Gordon v. Goertz, 1996 CanLII 191 (SCC), [1996] 2 S.C.R. 27 at para. 49. However, on a motion in relation to interim mobility, the evidentiary record, usually consisting of affidavits where some of the material evidence is in conflict, makes it impossible to carefully consider all of the factors as summarized in Gordon v. Goertz; indeed, such is the situation in the present case. The full analysis as required by Gordon v. Goertz in this case, can only be conducted by the trial judge.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.