It must be kept in mind, when considering that list of factors, that Gold v. Gold was not a case involving children. It involved the division of substantial family assets “with each party ending up with a substantial estate”, and was heard by a five person panel because a practice had arisen of requiring all family litigants to bear their own costs unless special circumstances justified a different order. The court decided there was no special rule for matrimonial cases.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.