British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Wipfli v. Britten, 1983 CanLII 432 (BC SC):
I return to the test used in Daish v. Wauton, quoted supra, to identify: … benefits not to be regarded as mitigating loss, whether as a result of legislation or contract or benevolence; namely, [were they] "conferred … independently … of a right of redress against other but so that they may be enjoyed by him [the plaintiff] although he enforce that right … [?]"
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.