One further lesson from this analysis is that German’s suit, while nominally dealing with malice, actually seeks to re-try issues of fact already decided against him. In order to succeed. German would be required to have a judge find that the two judges in his criminal case were mistaken in finding a prima facie case against him. He should not be permitted to do that; he seeks to abuse the process by trying to re-litigate that issue. See Grandview v. Doering 1975 CanLII 16 (SCC), [1976] 1 W.W.R. 388 (S.C.C.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.