In Garland v. Clarke (1982), 41 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 75, 119 A.P.R. 75 (Nfld. D.C.), the defendant had assumed a fiduciary duty in relation to the management of the plaintiffs’ money. He used this money to create an apartment, thereby enhancing the value of his own real property. As fiduciary, he was held accountable for expenditures of the money received (at paragraph 25). The court further found the defendant to be in breach of the trust for failing to obtain direction from the court in advance of making the expenditures (paragraphs 39-40).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.