California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Walsh v. Bronson, 200 Cal.App.3d 259, 245 Cal.Rptr. 888 (Cal. App. 1988):
For the foregoing reasons we also conclude that respondents have negated the element of malice. Appellants' sole contention regarding the existence of malice is the observation that it can be inferred from a lack of probable cause. Since we have concluded that probable cause was present, we also conclude that malice is nonexistent. The thoroughness of respondents' research and investigation negates any possible inference of malice. (See Grindle v. Lorbeer
Page 895
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.