What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has met the onus of proof?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Benoit v. Willy's Water Service (2001) Ltd., 2007 ABPC 277 (CanLII):

As we know, Fontaine v. British Columbia 1998 CanLII 814 (SCC), [1997] S.C.J. 100, has ended the res ipsa locquitur principle of law (see paragraphs 26 infra). This case turns on whether the Plaintiffs have met the onus of proof that rests upon them.

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has met the onus of proof for the causation question? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has been successful in a claim against Hanna? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a duly qualified medical professional can examine a plaintiff pursuant to Rule 217? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff is entitled to damages from an event that may happen in the future? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a third party has been negligent in causing the injury of a plaintiff by accident? (Alberta, Canada)
What factors are considered to be determinative in determining whether a medical malpractice case is successful or unsuccessful? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has been successful in her claim for wrongful dismissal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether an occupier of a building is liable for damage caused to a plaintiff's property by an electrical shock? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a tortfeasor is liable for a plaintiff's injuries? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has made all reasonable efforts to establish the identity of the driver? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.