The changes that FICOM required may or may not have been significant to these defendants or other purchasers, but as the law stands, a developer is not excused from strict compliance with the statutory disclosure requirements simply because the amendments appear to be insignificant to the developer. In Pinto v. Revelstoke Mountain Resort Limited Partnership, 2010 BCSC 422, in a paragraph quoted in the Court of Appeal decision, 2011 BCCA 210, the summary trial judge said:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.