I propose to follow the statement of principle made by the court in Berta v. Berta, as restated. Costs in a family case should be awarded on a partial indemnity basis unless there is good reason founded upon a factor in the family law rules or clear binding authority to award elevated costs if warranted by the circumstances. I also note that Family Law Rule 24(1) itself does not describe the level of costs that flows from the presumption that a successful party is entitled to costs.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.