Extradition proceedings are intended to be expeditious procedures to determine whether a trial should be held in the state that seeks a person’s return. The hearing is to be expedited, designed to keep expenses to a minimum and ensure prompt compliance with Canada’s international obligations. It is not, and must not become the equivalent or near equivalent of the domestic trial of a criminal case. See Re McVey; McVey v. United States of America, 1992 CanLII 48 (SCC), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 475, 77 C.C.C. (3d) 1 at 55, 97 D.L.R. (4th) 193, per La Forest J.; and United States of America v. Dynar, 1997 CanLII 359 (SCC), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 462, 115 C.C.C. (3d) 481 at 522, 147 D.L.R. (4th) 399, per Cory and Iacobucci JJ.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.